Among the 7 D-SUV 2013–2017, the Macan S ranks 6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h (5.3 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 6th of 7 in Top speed (251 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 6th of 7 in Power-to-weight (182 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
95B.1 · GENERATION 2015 → · FAMILY SUV
PorscheICE
Macan S
340 hp, 5,3 s 0-100 : among the 7 D-SUV 2013–2017, the Macan S ranks 6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 6th of 7 in Top speed, 6th of 7 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
460 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.3s
VMax 251 km/h
Cons.
12.4L
/100 km
Tank
74.951118L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Macan S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 345 hp |
| Combined power | 340 hp |
| Combined torque | 460 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12.4 L/100km |
| Tank | 74.951118 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,3 s |
| VMax | 251 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,681 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,807 mm |
| Width | 1,934 mm |
| Height | 1,609 mm |
| Boot | 18 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,865 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 7 D-SUV, the Macan S ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.3 s 0-100 (6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Macan S ranks 6th of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 1.5 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).
Top speed: 251 km/h (6th of 7 in Top speed)
Top speed of 251 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Macan S stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 7 D-SUV marketed between 2013–2017.
0–100 km/h6e / 7
5,3 s
Min 5,3 s · Porsche Macan SMax 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Top speed6e / 7
251 km/h
Min 251 km/h · Porsche Macan SMax 283 km/h · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight6e / 7
182 hp/t
Min 182 hp/t · Porsche Macan SMax 279 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
X3 M40i354 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X4 M40i354 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X3 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X3 M40i360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Macan 95B.1 range
Generation 95B.1 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Macan S
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Macan S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 5.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan S vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.