Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 wins (4,81 s vs 5,58 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | X4 M40d G02 | 740Le iPerformance G11 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.81 s | 5.58 s | 0.77 s · X4 M40d G02 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.15 s | 13.77 s | 0.62 s · X4 M40d G02 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.10 s | 25.05 s | 0.95 s · X4 M40d G02 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.94 kg/hp | 5.95 kg/hp | better ratio · X4 M40d G02 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | X4 M40d G02 | 740Le iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.19 s · tight gap | 1.29 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 2.14 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.42 s | 3.85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.81 s | 5.58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6.55 s | 7.52 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.38 s | 12.85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18.97 s | 21.11 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13.15 s | 13.77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.10 s | 25.05 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 020 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X4 M40d hits 100 km/h in 4.81 s versus 5.58 s for the 740Le iPerformance. Despite lacking instant torque, 340 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X4 M40d leads by 0.77 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X4 M40d is doing 138 km/h against 132 km/h for the 740Le iPerformance. The gap is 0.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X4 M40d crosses the line in 13.14 s versus 13.77 s. The 0.63 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the X4 M40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 192 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X4 M40d finishes in 24.09 s versus 25.05 s, with a 0.96 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X4 M40d and the 740Le iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.68 seconds. The 0.77 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40d G02 wins (4,81 s vs 5,58 s).
X4 M40d G02 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,81 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X4 M40d G02: 340 hp, ratio 5,94 kg/hp. 740Le iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp.
X4 M40d G02: 250 km/h. 740Le iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.