Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40i G02 wins (4,75 s vs 6,07 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M40i G02 | X6 xDrive30d G06 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,75 s−1,32 s | 6,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,00 s−1,36 s | 14,36 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,61 s−2,82 s | 26,43 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M40i G02 | X6 xDrive30d G06 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 1,35 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,51 s | 4,22 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,75 s | 6,07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,32 s | 8,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,58 s | 15,25 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,20 s | 27,60 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,00 s | 14,36 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,61 s | 26,43 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 825 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the X4 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.76 s versus 6.07 s for the X6 xDrive30d. At this point, the X4 M40i leads by 1.32 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X4 M40i is doing 143 km/h against 126 km/h for the X6 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.76 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X4 M40i crosses the line in 12.99 s versus 14.35 s. The 1.36 s gap represents roughly 58 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X4 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X4 M40i finishes in 23.60 s versus 26.42 s, with a 2.82 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X4 M40i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the X6 xDrive30d at 235 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.16 kg/hp vs 7.64 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.84 seconds. The 1.32 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, X4 M40i G02 wins (4,75 s vs 6,07 s).
X4 M40i G02 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,75 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X4 M40i G02: 354 hp, ratio 5,16 kg/hp. X6 xDrive30d G06: 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
X4 M40i G02: 250 km/h. X6 xDrive30d G06: 235 km/h.