Among the 12 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 M40i ranks 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 10th of 12 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 6th of 12 in Power-to-weight (194 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
G02 · GENERATION 2018 → · FAMILY SUV
BMWICE
X4 M40i
354 hp, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2016–2020, the X4 M40i ranks 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 12 in Top speed, 6th of 12 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
354hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.8s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
9.1L
/100 km
Tank
65L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X4 M40i
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,998 cm³ |
| Power | 354 hp |
| Couple | 500 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.1 L/100km |
| Tank | 65 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,8 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,733 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,864 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm |
| Height | 1,621 mm |
| Boot | 525 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,825 kg |
| Cd | 0.3 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 206 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 D-SUV, the X4 M40i ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.8 s 0-100 (5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X4 M40i ranks 5th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 1.0 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (10th of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X4 M40i stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2016–2020.
0–100 km/h5e / 12
4,8 s
Min 5,3 s · Porsche Macan SMax 3,8 s · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Top speed10e / 12
250 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw X3 M40iMax 283 km/h · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Power-to-weight6e / 12
194 hp/t
Min 172 hp/t · Bmw X4 M40dMax 279 hp/t · Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Macan S354 hp · 0-100 5.2 s
Macan GTS360 hp · 0-100 5.1 s
Macan GTS360 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
SQ5 Sportback367 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X4 G02 range
Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G02
Compare
Popular duels involving the X4 M40i
Frequently asked questions
BMW X4 M40i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X4 M40i vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.