Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40i G02 gagne (4,87 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X4 M40i G02 | Q6 SUV e-tron | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s−1,96 s | 6,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,08 s−1,93 s | 15,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,70 s−3,36 s | 27,06 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+40 km/h | 210 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,18 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,28 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X4 M40i G02 | Q6 SUV e-tron |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,93 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,21 s | 3,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,62 s | 5,19 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,87 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,42 s | 8,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,68 s | 15,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,33 s | 28,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,08 s | 15,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,70 s | 27,06 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 210 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 865 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | X4 M40i | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.87 s versus 6.82 s for the Q6 SUV e-tron. Despite lacking instant torque, 360 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw X4 M40i leads by 1.96 s and sits roughly 22 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 128 km/h for the Q6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 1.38 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 M40i crosses the line in 13.08 s versus 15.00 s. The 1.93 s gap represents roughly 81 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X4 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 M40i finishes in 23.70 s versus 27.06 s, with a 3.36 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X4 M40i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Q6 SUV e-tron at 210 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 1.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 M40i G02 gagne (4,87 s vs 6,82 s).
X4 M40i G02 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,87 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X4 M40i G02 : 360 hp, ratio 5,18 kg/hp. Q6 SUV e-tron : 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp.
X4 M40i G02 : 250 km/h. Q6 SUV e-tron : 210 km/h.