Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 xDrive20d G02 gagne (7,97 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | X4 xDrive20d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,97 s+0,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,80 s+0,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,29 s+0,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h+2 km/h | 213 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,74 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | X4 xDrive20d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 2,59 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 5,34 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 11,41 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 22,09 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | 50,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,29 stight gap |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 213 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | E-PACE P200 2018 | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 850 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d hits 100 km/h in 7.97 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d is doing 113 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.50 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d crosses the line in 15.80 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows.
At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X4 xDrive20d finishes in 29.28 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.13 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the E-PACE P200 and the Bmw X4 xDrive20d are governed to 215 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 9.74 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.55 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X4 xDrive20d G02 gagne (7,97 s vs 8,35 s).
E-PACE P200 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. X4 xDrive20d G02 : 190 hp, ratio 9,74 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h. X4 xDrive20d G02 : 213 km/h.