Among the 8 D-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X4 xDrive20d ranks 1st of 8 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 1st of 6 in Tank range (1333 km, behind the Bmw X4 xDrive20d), 6th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Bmw X3 M40d).
BMW X4 xDrive20d
190 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 8 D-SUV hybrid 2018–2022, the X4 xDrive20d ranks 1st of 8 in Combined consumption, 1st of 6 in Tank range, 6th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.9s
VMax 213 km/h
Cons.
5.1L
/100 km
Tank
68L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Puissance électrique
- 11 hp
- Combined power
- 190 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,9 s
- VMax
- 213 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,752 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,864 mm
- Width
- 1,918 mm
- Height
- 1,621 mm
- Boot
- 525 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,850 kg
- Cd
- 0.31
- CO₂ WLTP
- 133 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 8 D-SUV hybrid, the X4 xDrive20d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 8 in Combined consumption (5.1 L/100), 1st of 6 in Tank range (1333 km).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M40d (1st with 4.9 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.1 L/100 L/100 (1st of 8 in Combined consumption)
The X4 xDrive20d consumes 5.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X4 xDrive20d (5.1 L/100).
Tank range: 1333 km (1st of 6 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X4 xDrive20d covers 1333 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1333 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the X4 xDrive20d stands against D-SUV hybrid
Comparison across 8 D-SUV hybrid marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption1e / 8
5.1 L/100
Min 7.5 L/100 · Volvo XC60 B5 AWD GeartronicMax 5.1 L/100 · Bmw X4 xDrive20d
Tank range1e / 6
1 333 km
Min 1 133 km · Bmw X3 M40dMax 1 333 km · Bmw X4 xDrive20d
0–100 km/h6e / 8
7,9 s
Min 9,2 s · Lexus NX 300h AWDMax 4,9 s · Bmw X3 M40d
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
DieselAudi Q5 Sportback204 hp · 7.4 sDieselSkoda Kodiaq 2.0 TDI 190 4x4 7DSG190 hp · 7.5 sDieselMercedes GLC 220 d 4MATIC197 hp · 7.7 sDieselPeugeot 5008 BlueHDi 130 EAT8131 hp · 11.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X4 G02 range
Generation G02 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G02
Popular duels involving the X4 xDrive20d
BMW X4 xDrive20d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1333 km on a full tank (5.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 6 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.