Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,86 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne E3.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−0,23 s | 5,86 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s−0,31 s | 14,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s−0,69 s | 26,05 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+5 km/h | 240 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,84 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,87 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne E3.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,42 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,29 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,02 s | 4,12 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 5,86 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,59 s | 8,07 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,19 s | 14,44 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,12 s | 25,85 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 14,18 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s | 26,05 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 240 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 620 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 820 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Cayenne hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.86 s for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. At this point, the Cayenne leads by 0.23 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne is doing 133 km/h against 129 km/h for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.16 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 14.18 s. The 0.31 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne finishes in 25.36 s versus 26.04 s, with a 0.69 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 240 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne is capped at 245 km/h, the Bmw X4 xDrive30d at 240 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.84 kg/hp vs 6.87 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.38 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,86 s).
Cayenne E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp. X4 xDrive30d G02: 265 hp, ratio 6,87 kg/hp.
Cayenne E3.1: 245 km/h. X4 xDrive30d G02: 240 km/h.