Among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne ranks 18th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo), 16th of 22 in Top speed (245 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo), 17th of 22 in Power-to-weight (171 hp/t, behind the Bmw X6 M Competition).
E3.1 · GENERATION 2019 → · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE
Cayenne
340 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2017–2021, the Cayenne ranks 18th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 16th of 22 in Top speed, 17th of 22 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.7s
VMax 245 km/h
Cons.
11.2L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 340 hp |
| Combined power | 340 hp |
| Combined torque | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 23.7 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,7 s |
| VMax | 245 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,917 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,893 mm |
| Width | 1,981 mm |
| Height | 1,694 mm |
| Boot | 27 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,985 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (18th of 22 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne ranks 18th of 22 in 0–100 km/h, 1.9 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo (3.8 s).
Top speed: 245 km/h (16th of 22 in Top speed)
Top speed of 245 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2017–2021.
0–100 km/h18e / 22
5,7 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,8 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Top speed16e / 22
245 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 285 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Power-to-weight17e / 22
171 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 269 hp/t · Bmw X6 M Competition
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q8 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range
Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the E3.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 5.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.