Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 5,49 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
3.83 s
5.49 s
| Measure | X5 M Competition G05 | 740e iPerformance G11 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.83 s | 5.49 s | 1.66 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| 400 m standing start | 11.95 s | 13.69 s | 1.74 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.80 s | 24.90 s | 3.10 s · X5 M Competition G05 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.74 kg/hp | 5.83 kg/hp | better ratio · X5 M Competition G05 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | X5 M Competition G05 | 740e iPerformance G11 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.06 s | 1.27 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.73 s | 2.12 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.90 s | 3.79 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.83 s | 5.49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.02 s | 7.38 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8.23 s | 12.61 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13.32 s | 20.69 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.95 s | 13.69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21.80 s | 24.90 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 335 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X5 M Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.83 s versus 5.49 s for the 740e iPerformance. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X5 M Competition leads by 1.66 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X5 M Competition is doing 155 km/h against 133 km/h for the 740e iPerformance. The gap is 1.11 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X5 M Competition crosses the line in 11.94 s versus 13.68 s. The 1.74 s gap represents roughly 78 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X5 M Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 187 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X5 M Competition finishes in 21.80 s versus 24.90 s, with a 3.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X5 M Competition and the 740e iPerformance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.52 seconds. The 1.66 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X5 M Competition G05 wins (3,83 s vs 5,49 s).
X5 M Competition G05 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,83 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X5 M Competition G05: 625 hp, ratio 3,74 kg/hp. 740e iPerformance G11: 326 hp, ratio 5,83 kg/hp.
X5 M Competition G05: 250 km/h. 740e iPerformance G11: 250 km/h.