Among the 19 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 M Competition ranks 2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 11th of 19 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 3rd of 19 in Power-to-weight (268 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).
G05 · GENERATION 2021 → · LARGE SUV
BMWICE
X5 M Competition
625 hp, 3,8 s 0-100 : among the 19 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 M Competition ranks 2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 19 in Top speed, 3rd of 19 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
625hp
750 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.8s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
13.3L
/100 km
Tank
83L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X5 M Competition
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Displacement | 4,395 cm³ |
| Power | 625 hp |
| Couple | 750 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.3 L/100km |
| Tank | 83 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,8 s |
| 0 → 200 km/h | 13,40 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,938 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,972 mm |
| Width | 2,015 mm |
| Height | 1,748 mm |
| Boot | 650 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,335 kg |
| Cd | 0.38 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 303 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 19 E-SUV, the X5 M Competition ranks (top 2 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 3rd of 19 in Power-to-weight (268 hp/t). 2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s), 3rd of 19 in Power-to-weight (268 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 13,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 3.2 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 299 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 3.8 s 0-100 (2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X5 M Competition ranks 2nd of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (3.2 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (11th of 19 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 299 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X5 M Competition stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 19 E-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
0–100 km/h2e / 19
3,8 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Top speed11e / 19
250 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 299 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Power-to-weight3e / 19
268 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 282 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
RS Q8 SUV640 hp · 0-100 3.6 s
RS Q8 SUV600 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
Cayenne Turbo S570 hp · 0-100 4.4 s
Cayenne Turbo S570 hp · 0-100 3.9 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X5 G05 range
Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G05
Compare
Popular duels involving the X5 M Competition
Frequently asked questions
BMW X5 M Competition: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT leads in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s vs 3.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 M Competition vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.