Over 0–100 km/h, Urus SE wins (3,46 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Urus SE | X5 M50d F15 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s−1,70 s | 5,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,30 s−2,17 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s−4,12 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 312 km/h+62 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,29 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,69 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Urus SE | X5 M50d F15 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,01 s | 1,33 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,69 s | 2,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,66 s | 3,71 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,46 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,42 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,00 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,75 s | 20,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,30 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,49 s | 24,61 s |
| Top speed limited | 312 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 653 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 900 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed torque-converter automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 275 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Urus SE hits 100 km/h in 3.46 s versus 5.15 s for the Bmw X5 M50d. The instant torque of 900 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Urus SE leads by 1.70 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Urus SE is doing 166 km/h against 136 km/h for the Bmw X5 M50d. The gap is 1.34 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Urus SE crosses the line in 11.30 s versus 13.47 s. The 2.17 s gap represents roughly 98 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Urus SE continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 229 km/h versus 189 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Urus SE finishes in 20.49 s versus 24.60 s, with a 4.11 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Urus SE is capped at 312 km/h, the Bmw X5 M50d at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.07 seconds. The 1.70 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Urus SE wins (3,46 s vs 5,15 s).
Urus SE goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,46 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Urus SE: 653 hp, ratio 3,29 kg/hp. X5 M50d F15: 400 hp, ratio 5,69 kg/hp.
Urus SE: 312 km/h. X5 M50d F15: 250 km/h.