Urus SE
653 hp, 60 km electric range, 3,4 s 0-100 : among the 2 F-SUV plug-in hybrid 2022–2026, the Urus SE ranks Electric WLTP range, Combined range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
653hp
900 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
3.4s
VMax 312 km/h
Total range
—km
of which 60 km elec
Battery + Tank
23.3kWh
+ 0 L tank
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Lamborghini Urus SE
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 653 hp |
| Couple | 900 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | Urus SE |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 23.3 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 60 km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 3,4 s |
| VMax | 312 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 2,016 mm |
| Height | 1,638 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,150 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 2 F-SUV plug-in hybrid, the Urus SE combines two vehicles in one: an electric sedan for urban use, a petrol tourer for long distances. Caralogy puts the Urus SE through its paces: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 0–100 km/h (3.4 s). 0–100 km/h (3.4 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Electric WLTP range, the Bmw XM 50e (1st with 77 km) takes the lead. If the priority is Combined range, the Bmw XM 50e (1st with 857 km) takes the lead.
In the city: 60 km pure electric ()
With a full battery, the Urus SE drives in pure electric mode for the first 60 km WLTP — placing it Electric WLTP range, behind the Bmw XM 50e (77 km). In urban and peri-urban use, the Urus SE behaves like a pure electric sedan in its segment.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Urus SE stands against F-SUV plug-in hybrid
Comparison across 2 F-SUV plug-in hybrid marketed between 2022–2026.
Electric WLTP range
2eout of 2
Combined range
2eout of 2
0–100 km/h
1eout of 2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
XM 50e
476 hp · 0-100 5.1 s
iX M60
619 hp · 0-100 3.8 s
Purosangue V12 725
725 hp · 0-100 3.3 s
X7 M50i
530 hp · 0-100 4.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Urus SE
Take the next step
Find a Urus SE or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Lamborghini Urus SE: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 2 F-SUV plug-in hybrid 2022–2026, the Urus SE ranks Electric WLTP range (60 km, behind the Bmw XM 50e), Combined range (60 km, behind the Bmw XM 50e), 0–100 km/h (3.4 s, behind the Lamborghini Urus SE).
60 km WLTP announced — making it the autonomie du segment out of 2 models. The reference is the Bmw XM 50e (77 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw XM 50e leads in Electric WLTP range (77 km vs 60 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Urus SE vs Bmw XM 50e duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.