Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 xDrive40d G05 gagne (5,58 s vs 5,77 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X5 xDrive40d G05 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s−0,19 s | 5,77 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s−0,09 s | 14,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,54 s−0,11 s | 25,65 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h+2 km/h | 243 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,47 kg/hp | 6,22 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X5 xDrive40d G05 | Cayenne Coupe E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,20 s | 2,21 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,96 s | 4,08 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 5,77 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,65 s | 7,83 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,54 s | 13,74 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,78 s | 24,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,92 s | 14,01 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,54 s | 25,65 stight gap |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 243 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d hits 100 km/h in 5.58 s versus 5.77 s for the Cayenne Coupe. At this point, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d leads by 0.19 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d is doing 131 km/h against 131 km/h for the Cayenne Coupe. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d crosses the line in 13.92 s versus 14.00 s. The 0.09 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 181 km/h versus 182 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X5 xDrive40d finishes in 25.54 s versus 25.64 s, with a 0.10 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 243 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw X5 xDrive40d and the Cayenne Coupe are governed to 245 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.47 kg/hp vs 6.22 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs auto).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.00 seconds. The 0.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X5 xDrive40d G05 gagne (5,58 s vs 5,77 s).
X5 xDrive40d G05 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,58 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X5 xDrive40d G05 : 340 hp, ratio 6,47 kg/hp. Cayenne Coupe E3.1 : 340 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp.
X5 xDrive40d G05 : 245 km/h. Cayenne Coupe E3.1 : 243 km/h.