Among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Coupe ranks 21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (5.8 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 20th of 23 in Top speed (243 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 21th of 23 in Power-to-weight (161 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).
E3.1 · GENERATION 2020 → · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE
Cayenne Coupe
340 hp, 5,8 s 0-100 : among the 23 E-SUV 2018–2022, the Cayenne Coupe ranks 21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 20th of 23 in Top speed, 21th of 23 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.8s
VMax 243 km/h
Cons.
11.7L
/100 km
Tank
23.7L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Coupe
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 3 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 340 hp |
| Combined power | 340 hp |
| Combined torque | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 23.7 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,8 s |
| VMax | 243 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,917 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,896 mm |
| Width | 1,981 mm |
| Height | 1,676 mm |
| Boot | 22 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,115 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 E-SUV, the Cayenne Coupe ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.8 s 0-100 (21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Cayenne Coupe ranks 21th of 23 in 0–100 km/h, 2.6 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (3.2 s).
Top speed: 243 km/h (20th of 23 in Top speed)
Top speed of 243 km/h. The segment reference reaches 299 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne Coupe stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 23 E-SUV marketed between 2018–2022.
0–100 km/h21e / 23
5,8 s
Min 6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Top speed20e / 23
243 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 299 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Power-to-weight21e / 23
161 hp/t
Min 149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300Max 282 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q8 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayenne E3.1 range
Generation E3.1 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the E3.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne Coupe
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne Coupe: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT leads in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s vs 5.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne Coupe vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.