X5 xDrive40d
340 hp, 5,5 s 0-100 : among the 6 E-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X5 xDrive40d ranks 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 3rd of 6 in Top speed, 3rd of 6 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
700 Nm · 11 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
5.5s
VMax 245 km/h
Cons.
6.5L
/100 km
Tank
80L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X5 xDrive40d
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 6 cyl. |
| Displacement | 2,993 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance électrique | 11 hp |
| Combined power | 340 hp |
| Couple | 700 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6,5 L/100km |
| Tank | 80 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,5 s |
| VMax | 245 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,922 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,745 mm |
| Boot | 650 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,200 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 172 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 6 E-SUV hybrid, the X5 xDrive40d ranks (best in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (5.5 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is Top speed, the Bmw X6 xDrive40d (1st with 248 km/h) takes the lead. If the priority is Power-to-weight, the Bmw X5 xDrive40i (1st with 159 hp/t) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.5 s 0-100 (1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the X5 xDrive40d ranks 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h, 0.0 s off the reference Bmw X5 xDrive40d (5.5 s).
Top speed: 245 km/h (3rd of 6 in Top speed)
Top speed of 245 km/h. The segment reference reaches 248 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the X5 xDrive40d stands against E-SUV hybrid
Comparison across 6 E-SUV hybrid marketed between 2019–2023.
0–100 km/h
1eout of 6
Top speed
3eout of 6
Power-to-weight
3eout of 6
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cayenne Coupe
340 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
Cayenne Coupe
340 hp · 0-100 5.8 s
Q7 SUV
340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Cayenne
340 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X5 G05 range
Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G05
Compare
Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive40d
Take the next step
Find a X5 xDrive40d or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
BMW X5 xDrive40d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 6 E-SUV hybrid 2019–2023, the X5 xDrive40d ranks 1st of 6 in 0–100 km/h (5.5 s, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive40d), 3rd of 6 in Top speed (245 km/h, behind the Bmw X6 xDrive40d), 3rd of 6 in Power-to-weight (155 hp/t, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive40i).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.