Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ2 gagne (4,94 s vs 5,29 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50d F16 | SQ2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 4,94 s+0,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,47 s+0,16 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,55 s+0,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 257 km/h−7 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,73 kg/hp | 5,12 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50d F16 | SQ2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,24 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 2,07 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,83 s | 3,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,29 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,14 s | 7,19 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,41 s | 12,14 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,42 s | 19,93 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,63 s | 13,47 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,91 s | 24,55 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 257 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 740 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 535 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ2 hits 100 km/h in 4.94 s versus 5.29 s for the Bmw X6 M50d. At this point, the SQ2 leads by 0.35 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ2 is doing 133 km/h against 135 km/h for the Bmw X6 M50d. The gap is 0.16 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ2 crosses the line in 13.47 s versus 13.62 s. The 0.15 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the SQ2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 187 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ2 finishes in 24.55 s versus 24.91 s, with a 0.36 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 257 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw X6 M50d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.73 kg/hp vs 5.12 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.36 seconds. The 0.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ2 gagne (4,94 s vs 5,29 s).
X6 M50d F16 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,29 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X6 M50d F16 : 381 hp, ratio 5,73 kg/hp. SQ2 : 300 hp, ratio 5,12 kg/hp.
X6 M50d F16 : 250 km/h. SQ2 : 257 km/h.