Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50i G06 gagne (4,25 s vs 4,49 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X6 M50i G06 | Macan GTS 95B.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s−0,24 s | 4,49 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−0,31 s | 12,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s−0,66 s | 22,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 272 km/h−22 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,44 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X6 M50i G06 | Macan GTS 95B.3 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,25 s | 1,21 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 2,01 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,27 s | 3,29 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,25 s | 4,49 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,46 s | 5,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,75 s | 9,62 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,66 s | 15,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 12,61 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 22,80 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | 8 cyl |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 240 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 960 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
Off the line, the Bmw X6 M50i hits 100 km/h in 4.26 s versus 4.49 s for the Macan GTS. The 0.24 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i is doing 154 km/h against 147 km/h for the Macan GTS. The gap is 0.15 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw X6 M50i crosses the line in 12.29 s versus 12.61 s. The 0.31 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 214 km/h versus 206 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw X6 M50i finishes in 22.14 s versus 22.79 s, with a 0.66 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (272 km/h), the Macan GTS never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw X6 M50i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Macan GTS at 272 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.23 kg/hp vs 5.44 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.65 seconds. The 0.24 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X6 M50i G06 gagne (4,25 s vs 4,49 s).
X6 M50i G06 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,25 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X6 M50i G06 : 530 hp, ratio 4,23 kg/hp. Macan GTS 95B.3 : 360 hp, ratio 5,44 kg/hp.
X6 M50i G06 : 250 km/h. Macan GTS 95B.3 : 272 km/h.