95B.3 · GENERATION 2022 · FAMILY SUV
PorscheICE

Macan GTS

360 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2020–2024, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 12 in Top speed, 8th of 12 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,00015,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

360hp

500 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.5s

VMax 272 km/h

Cons.

9.9L

/100 km

Tank

75L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Macan GTS

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Turbo
Displacement2,894 cm³
Puissance thermique446 hp
Combined power360 hp
Combined torque500 Nm
GearboxDouble embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP9.9 L/100km
Tank75 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,5 s
0 → 160 km/h10,50 s
0 → 200 km/h17,10 s
VMax272 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,726 mm
Wheelbase2,807 mm
Height1,596 mm
Boot458 L
Kerb weight1,960 kg
Cd0.35
CO₂ WLTP225 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 12 D-SUV, the Macan GTS ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h). 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).

Top speed: 272 km/h (2nd of 12 in Top speed)

Top speed of 272 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the Macan GTS stands against D-SUV

Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2020–2024.

0–100 km/h4e / 12
4,5 s
Min 5,3 s · Cupra Terramar VZMax 4,1 s · Bmw X3 M Competition
Top speed2e / 12
272 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Bmw X4 M CompetitionMax 285 km/h · Jaguar F-PACE SVR
Power-to-weight8e / 12
184 hp/t
Min 168 hp/t · Bmw X3 M40dMax 272 hp/t · Jaguar F-PACE SVR

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Porsche Macan 95B.3 range

Generation 95B.3 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the 95B.3

Compare

Popular duels involving the Macan GTS

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Macan GTS: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 12 D-SUV 2020–2024, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 8th of 12 in Power-to-weight (184 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw X3 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan GTS vs Bmw X3 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.