Among the 12 D-SUV 2020–2024, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Bmw X3 M Competition), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR), 8th of 12 in Power-to-weight (184 hp/t, behind the Jaguar F-PACE SVR).
Macan GTS
360 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 12 D-SUV 2020–2024, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 2nd of 12 in Top speed, 8th of 12 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
360hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.5s
VMax 272 km/h
Cons.
9.9L
/100 km
Tank
75L
Full specifications Porsche Macan GTS
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Turbo |
| Displacement | 2,894 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 446 hp |
| Combined power | 360 hp |
| Combined torque | 500 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 9.9 L/100km |
| Tank | 75 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,5 s |
| 0 → 160 km/h | 10,50 s |
| 0 → 200 km/h | 17,10 s |
| VMax | 272 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,726 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,807 mm |
| Height | 1,596 mm |
| Boot | 458 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,960 kg |
| Cd | 0.35 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 225 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 12 D-SUV, the Macan GTS ranks (top 4 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h). 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s), 2nd of 12 in Top speed (272 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw X3 M Competition (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Jaguar F-PACE SVR (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Macan GTS ranks 4th of 12 in 0–100 km/h, 0.4 s off the reference Bmw X3 M Competition (4.1 s).
Top speed: 272 km/h (2nd of 12 in Top speed)
Top speed of 272 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the Macan GTS stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 12 D-SUV marketed between 2020–2024.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Macan 95B.3 range
Generation 95B.3 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.3
Popular duels involving the Macan GTS
Porsche Macan GTS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Bmw X3 M Competition leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan GTS vs Bmw X3 M Competition duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.