Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 7,76 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| P7 | Han EV 200kW 2WD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s−3,54 s | 7,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s−3,19 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s−2,96 s | 28,21 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 180 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,76 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | P7 | Han EV 200kW 2WD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 2,20 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 3,68 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 5,92 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 7,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,64 s | 10,11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,67 s | 17,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 28,21 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 110 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 7.76 s for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. At this point, the P7 leads by 3.55 s and sits roughly 30 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 123 km/h for the Han EV 200kW 2WD. The gap is 2.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 15.74 s. The 3.20 s gap represents roughly 129 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the Han EV 200kW 2WD keeps accelerating towards 180 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 3.38 s from 3.20 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the P7 finishes in 25.24 s versus 28.20 s, with just 2.96 s to spare. The Han EV 200kW 2WD fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the P7 is capped at 170 km/h, the Han EV 200kW 2WD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 7.76 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.56 seconds. The 3.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 7,76 s).
P7 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,21 seconds (calibrated simulation).
P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. Han EV 200kW 2WD: 272 hp, ratio 7,76 kg/hp.
P7: 170 km/h. Han EV 200kW 2WD: 180 km/h.