BYD Han EV 200kW 2WD
272 hp, 500 km range, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 22 grand tourers electric 2020–2024, the Han EV 200kW 2WD ranks 9th of 21 in WLTP range, 22th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 272 hp
- 350 Nm, dont 272 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.9 s
- VMax 180 km/h
- Range
- 500 km
- WLTP
- DC charging
- -
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Electric power
- 272 hp
- Combined power
- 272 hp
- Couple
- 350 Nm
- Gearbox
- Mono-rapport Automatique
Battery and charging
- Battery capacity
- 83 kWh
- Range WLTP
- 500 km
- EV cons. WLTP
- 16.0 kWh/100 km
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,9 s
- VMax
- 180 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Kerb weight
- 2,110 kg
- Cd
- 0.233
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 22 grand tourers electric, the Han EV 200kW 2WD ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Long daily commute (>50 km/day) without range anxiety.
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (1st with 730 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Tesla Model S Plaid (1st with 2.1 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 500 km WLTP (9th of 21 in WLTP range)
The Han EV 200kW 2WD offers 500 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceReal-world range
Simulate range by speed, temperature and driving style.
Simulate rangeWhere the Han EV 200kW 2WD stands against grand tourers electric
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BYD Han I range
Generation I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the I
Popular duels involving the Han EV 200kW 2WD
Continue with the BYD Han EV 200kW 2WD
The same car, from other angles.
BYD Han EV 200kW 2WD: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Han EV 200kW 2WD rank in its segment?
Among the 22 grand tourers electric 2020–2024, the Han EV 200kW 2WD ranks 9th of 21 in WLTP range (500 km, behind the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW), 22th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the Tesla Model S Plaid).
What is the WLTP range of the Han EV 200kW 2WD?
500 km WLTP announced - making it the 9th of 21 in WLTP range out of 21 models. The reference is the Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW (730 km).
How much does the Han EV 200kW 2WD cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW instead?
The Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW leads in WLTP range (730 km vs 500 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Han EV 200kW 2WD vs Audi A6 Sportback e-tron quattro 315 kW duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.