Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD wins (3,77 s vs 7,41 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Seal 390 AWD | Atto 3 Extended Range | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.77 s | 7.41 s | 3.64 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| 400 m standing start | 11.94 s | 15.57 s | 3.63 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.93 s | 29.20 s | 5.27 s · Seal 390 AWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 160 km/h | 20 km/h · Seal 390 AWD |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.06 kg/hp | 8.58 kg/hp | better ratio · Seal 390 AWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Seal 390 AWD | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.07 s | 1.96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.78 s | 3.27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.87 s | 5.43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.77 s | 7.41 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4.90 s | 10.03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8.21 s | 19.03 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11.94 s | 15.57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.93 s | 29.20 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 160 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Seal 390 AWD hits 100 km/h in 3.77 s versus 7.41 s for the Atto 3 Extended Range. At this point, the Seal 390 AWD leads by 3.64 s and sits roughly 25 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 390 AWD is doing 155 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 2.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 390 AWD crosses the line in 11.93 s versus 15.57 s. The 3.63 s gap represents roughly 141 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 390 AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 390 AWD finishes in 23.93 s versus 29.19 s, with a 5.26 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 390 AWD is capped at 180 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.06 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.71 seconds. The 3.64 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD wins (3,77 s vs 7,41 s).
Seal 390 AWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,77 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Seal 390 AWD: 530 hp, ratio 4,06 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
Seal 390 AWD: 180 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h.