Sur 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD gagne (3,77 s vs 4,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Seal 390 AWD | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,77 s−0,44 s | 4,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s−0,61 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,93 s−1,32 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h+10 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,06 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Seal 390 AWD | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,07 s | 1,11 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,78 s | 1,85 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,87 s | 3,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,77 s | 4,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,90 s | 5,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,21 s | 9,67 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,94 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,93 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 150 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction AWD |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Seal 390 AWD hits 100 km/h in 3.77 s versus 4.22 s for the P7. At this point, the Seal 390 AWD leads by 0.44 s and sits roughly 3 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Seal 390 AWD is doing 155 km/h against 147 km/h for the P7. The gap is 0.36 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Seal 390 AWD crosses the line in 11.93 s versus 12.54 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Seal 390 AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 180 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Seal 390 AWD finishes in 23.93 s versus 25.24 s, with a 1.31 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 170 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Seal 390 AWD is capped at 180 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.06 kg/hp vs 4.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.49 seconds. The 0.44 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Seal 390 AWD gagne (3,77 s vs 4,21 s).
Seal 390 AWD passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,77 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Seal 390 AWD : 530 hp, ratio 4,06 kg/hp. P7 : 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
Seal 390 AWD : 180 km/h. P7 : 170 km/h.