Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 and X6 xDrive30d G06 are neck and neck (5,98 s vs 6,07 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | X6 xDrive30d G06 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s−0,09 s | 6,07 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s−0,09 s | 14,36 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s−0,02 s | 26,43 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 235 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,23 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,64 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | X6 xDrive30d G06 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,35 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,09 s | 4,22 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,98 s | 6,07 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,25 s | 8,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,16 s | 15,25 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,87 s | 27,60 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,27 s | 14,36 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,41 s | 26,43 stight gap |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 185 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 hits 100 km/h in 5.98 s versus 6.07 s for the Bmw X6 xDrive30d. The instant torque of 500 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 is doing 127 km/h against 126 km/h for the Bmw X6 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.08 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 crosses the line in 14.27 s versus 14.35 s. The 0.08 s gap represents roughly 4 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 maxes out at 230 km/h while the Bmw X6 xDrive30d keeps accelerating towards 235 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.08 s.
At 1,000 metres, the DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 finishes in 26.41 s versus 26.42 s, with just 0.02 s to spare. The Bmw X6 xDrive30d fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 235 km/h, the Bmw X6 xDrive30d never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.84 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 and X6 xDrive30d G06 are neck and neck (5,98 s vs 6,07 s, no significant gap).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,98 seconds (calibrated simulation).
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp. X6 xDrive30d G06: 286 hp, ratio 7,64 kg/hp.
DS7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h. X6 xDrive30d G06: 235 km/h.