Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s−3,05 s | 8,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s−2,65 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s−3,99 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | DS9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 8,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 31,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the E 400 e 4MATIC hits 100 km/h in 5.31 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the E 400 e 4MATIC leads by 3.05 s and sits roughly 34 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC is doing 135 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 2.12 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the E 400 e 4MATIC crosses the line in 13.57 s versus 16.22 s. The 2.65 s gap represents roughly 107 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the E 400 e 4MATIC finishes in 24.58 s versus 28.57 s, with a 3.99 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the E 400 e 4MATIC never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.89 kg/hp vs 7.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 3.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, E 400 e 4MATIC W214 wins (5,30 s vs 8,36 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. DS9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. DS9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h.