Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | Cooper E FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 7,20 s+1,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,37 s+0,85 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s−0,36 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+75 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | Cooper E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 3,28 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 5,36 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 9,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 17,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Cooper E FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.20 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the Cooper E FWD leads by 1.16 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cooper E FWD is doing 124 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 0.80 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper E FWD crosses the line in 15.37 s versus 16.22 s. The 0.85 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Cooper E FWD maxes out at 160 km/h while the DS9 E-Tense 250 keeps accelerating towards 235 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.75 s.
Around 901 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the DS9 E-Tense 250 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 75 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the DS9 E-Tense 250 finishes in 28.57 s versus 28.93 s. The 0.36 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the Cooper E FWD never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.51 kg/hp vs 7.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 1.16 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 8,36 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. Cooper E FWD : 184 hp, ratio 7,58 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h. Cooper E FWD : 160 km/h.