Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 4,12 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 812 Superfast | M2 G87 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2.93 s | 4.12 s | 1.19 s · 812 Superfast |
| 400 m standing start | 10.38 s | 12.08 s | 1.70 s · 812 Superfast |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18.82 s | 21.81 s | 2.99 s · 812 Superfast |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h | 285 km/h | 42 km/h · 812 Superfast |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1.91 kg/hp | 3.76 kg/hp | better ratio · 812 Superfast |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 812 Superfast | M2 G87 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.85 s | 1.17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.43 s | 1.95 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.29 s | 3.06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2.93 s | 4.12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3.64 s | 5.26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5.54 s | 8.46 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8.29 s | 13.14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10.38 s | 12.08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18.82 s | 21.81 s |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 285 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
Off the line, the 812 Superfast hits 100 km/h in 2.93 s versus 4.12 s for the M2. At this point, the 812 Superfast leads by 1.19 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 Superfast is doing 182 km/h against 155 km/h for the M2. The gap is 1.14 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 Superfast crosses the line in 10.37 s versus 12.08 s. The 1.71 s gap represents roughly 89 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 812 Superfast continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 249 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 Superfast finishes in 18.81 s versus 21.80 s, with a 2.99 s lead.
Electronically capped at 285 km/h, the M2 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (1.91 kg/hp vs 3.76 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.94 seconds. The 1.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 4,12 s).
812 Superfast goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 Superfast: 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. M2 G87: 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
812 Superfast: 327 km/h. M2 G87: 285 km/h.