Sur 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast gagne (2,93 s vs 3,43 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 Superfast | Roma | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s−0,50 s | 3,43 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s−0,30 s | 10,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s−0,06 s | 18,88 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h | 357 km/h−30 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 2,37 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 Superfast | Roma |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,85 s | 1,03 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,43 s | 1,71 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,29 s | 2,75 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s | 3,43 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,64 s | 4,14 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,54 s | 5,92 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,29 s | 8,39 stight gap |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s | 10,68 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s | 18,88 stight gap |
| Top speed | 327 km/h | 357 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 812 Superfast | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 620 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 760 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 472 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Roma | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the 812 Superfast hits 100 km/h in 2.93 s versus 3.43 s for the Roma. At this point, the 812 Superfast leads by 0.50 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 Superfast is doing 182 km/h against 182 km/h for the Roma. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 Superfast crosses the line in 10.37 s versus 10.68 s. The 0.31 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The 812 Superfast maxes out at 327 km/h while the Roma keeps accelerating towards 357 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.25 s.
At 1,000 metres, the 812 Superfast finishes in 18.81 s versus 18.88 s, with just 0.07 s to spare. The Roma fails to fully close the launch gap.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (1.91 kg/hp vs 2.37 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.54 seconds. The 0.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast gagne (2,93 s vs 3,43 s).
812 Superfast passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 2,93 secondes (simulation calibrée).
812 Superfast : 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. Roma : 620 hp, ratio 2,37 kg/hp.
812 Superfast : 327 km/h. Roma : 357 km/h.