Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 812 Superfast | F-TYPE P300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s−2,70 s | 5,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s−3,31 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s−5,53 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 327 km/h+77 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 1,91 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 812 Superfast | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,85 s | 1,61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,43 s | 2,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,29 s | 4,30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,93 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,64 s | 7,17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,54 s | 11,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,29 s | 18,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,38 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,82 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed limited | 327 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 799 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 718 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 525 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the 812 Superfast hits 100 km/h in 2.93 s versus 5.63 s for the F-TYPE P300. At this point, the 812 Superfast leads by 2.70 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 812 Superfast is doing 182 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 2.32 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 812 Superfast crosses the line in 10.37 s versus 13.69 s. The 3.32 s gap represents roughly 151 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 812 Superfast continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 249 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 812 Superfast finishes in 18.81 s versus 24.35 s, with a 5.54 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the F-TYPE P300 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (1.91 kg/hp vs 5.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.14 seconds. The 2.70 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 812 Superfast wins (2,93 s vs 5,63 s).
812 Superfast goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 2,93 seconds (calibrated simulation).
812 Superfast: 799 hp, ratio 1,91 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
812 Superfast: 327 km/h. F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h.