Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d Touring G20 gagne (6,97 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 6,97 s+1,38 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,05 s+1,14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 27,94 s+1,47 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h | 230 km/h−15 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hp | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,16 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 2,20 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 4,69 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 6,97 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 9,95 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 18,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | 36,02 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,05 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 27,94 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 320d Touring hits 100 km/h in 6.97 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. At this point, the Bmw 320d Touring leads by 1.38 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring is doing 118 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 1.00 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320d Touring crosses the line in 15.05 s versus 16.19 s. The 1.14 s gap represents roughly 44 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 163 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320d Touring finishes in 27.93 s versus 29.41 s, with a 1.48 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Bmw 320d Touring at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.74 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 320d Touring G20 gagne (6,97 s vs 8,35 s).
E-PACE P200 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20 : 190 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h. 320d Touring G20 : 230 km/h.