Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E-PACE P200 | Cooper E FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,20 s+1,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,37 s+0,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,93 s+0,48 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h+55 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,74 kg/hp | 7,58 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E-PACE P200 | Cooper E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,98 s | 1,96 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,33 s | 3,28 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,88 s | 5,36 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,35 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,44 s | 9,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 21,17 s | 17,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,14 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 16,19 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Cooper E FWD hits 100 km/h in 7.20 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 290 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Cooper E FWD leads by 1.15 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cooper E FWD is doing 124 km/h against 115 km/h for the E-PACE P200. The gap is 0.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cooper E FWD crosses the line in 15.37 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.82 s gap represents roughly 32 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Cooper E FWD maxes out at 160 km/h while the E-PACE P200 keeps accelerating towards 215 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 1.02 s from 0.82 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the Cooper E FWD finishes in 28.93 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.48 s to spare. The E-PACE P200 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E-PACE P200 is capped at 215 km/h, the Cooper E FWD at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 1.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cooper E FWD gagne (7,20 s vs 8,35 s).
E-PACE P200 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp. Cooper E FWD : 184 hp, ratio 7,58 kg/hp.
E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h. Cooper E FWD : 160 km/h.