Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,98 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE P400e | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s−0,61 s | 5,98 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,60 s−0,67 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s−1,81 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 220 km/h | 230 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,55 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,23 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE P400e | 7 E-Tense 4x4 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,31 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,33 s | 2,11 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,92 s | 4,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,37 s | 5,98 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,10 s | 8,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,03 s | 15,16 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,71 s | 28,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,60 s | 14,27 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,60 s | 26,41 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 404 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 243 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (4WD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the F-PACE P400e hits 100 km/h in 5.37 s versus 5.98 s for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The 0.61 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE P400e is doing 137 km/h against 127 km/h for the 7 E-Tense 4x4 300. The gap is 0.26 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE P400e crosses the line in 13.60 s versus 14.27 s. The 0.67 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE P400e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE P400e finishes in 24.60 s versus 26.41 s, with a 1.81 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (220 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 220 km/h, the F-PACE P400e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.55 kg/hp vs 6.23 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.63 seconds. The 0.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE P400e wins (5,37 s vs 5,98 s).
F-PACE P400e goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-PACE P400e: 404 hp, ratio 5,55 kg/hp. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,23 kg/hp.
F-PACE P400e: 220 km/h. 7 E-Tense 4x4 300: 230 km/h.