Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 7,07 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | F-TYPE P300 | Q7 SUV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s | 7.07 s | 1.45 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.69 s | 15.11 s | 1.42 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 28.09 s | 3.74 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 226 km/h | 24 km/h · F-TYPE P300 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.32 kg/hp | 9.09 kg/hp | better ratio · F-TYPE P300 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | F-TYPE P300 | Q7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.61 s | 1.17 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.69 s | 2.22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.30 s | 4.70 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s | 7.07 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.17 s | 10.12 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11.54 s | 19.20 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18.21 s | 37.54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13.69 s | 15.11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24.35 s | 28.09 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 226 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 7.07 s for the Q7 SUV. Despite the faster sprint time, the Q7 SUV is 3 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 117 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.49 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 15.11 s. The 1.42 s gap represents roughly 56 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 162 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 28.09 s, with a 3.74 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE P300 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Q7 SUV at 226 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.32 kg/hp vs 9.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.95 seconds. The 1.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 7,07 s).
F-TYPE P300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. Q7 SUV: 231 hp, ratio 9,09 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h. Q7 SUV: 226 km/h.