Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 5,73 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE P300 | 430i F32 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−0,11 s | 5,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s−0,29 s | 13,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s−1,00 s | 25,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,99 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE P300 | 430i F32 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,69 s | 2,36 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,30 s | 4,12 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 5,73 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,17 s | 7,73 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,54 s | 13,25 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,21 s | 22,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s | 13,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 25,35 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 545 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.73 s for the 430i. Despite the faster sprint time, the 430i is 6 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 430i is doing 132 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 13.97 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 185 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 25.35 s, with a 0.99 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the F-TYPE P300 and the 430i are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.32 kg/hp vs 5.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.91 seconds. The 0.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 5,73 s).
F-TYPE P300 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. 430i F32: 258 hp, ratio 5,99 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h. 430i F32: 250 km/h.