Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 gagne (5,63 s vs 7,20 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE P300 | Cooper E FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−1,58 s | 7,20 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s−1,68 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s−4,58 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+90 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,58 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE P300 | Cooper E FWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,61 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,69 s | 3,28 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,30 s | 5,36 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 7,20 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,17 s | 9,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,54 s | 17,59 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 18,21 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 13,69 s | 15,37 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 28,93 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 290 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 7.20 s for the Cooper E FWD. Despite lacking instant torque, 300 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-TYPE P300 leads by 1.58 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 124 km/h for the Cooper E FWD. The gap is 1.02 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 15.37 s. The 1.68 s gap represents roughly 69 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 28.93 s, with a 4.58 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE P300 is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cooper E FWD at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.15 seconds. The 1.58 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 gagne (5,63 s vs 7,20 s).
F-TYPE P300 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,63 secondes (simulation calibrée).
F-TYPE P300 : 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp. Cooper E FWD : 184 hp, ratio 7,58 kg/hp.
F-TYPE P300 : 250 km/h. Cooper E FWD : 160 km/h.