Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 wins (3,74 s vs 4,21 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-TYPE R P575 | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s−0,48 s | 4,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s−1,03 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s−4,55 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 300 km/h+130 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,81 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-TYPE R P575 | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,10 s | 1,11 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,83 s | 1,85 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,99 s | 3,09 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,74 s | 4,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,75 s | 5,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,30 s | 9,67 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 11,00 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11,52 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,70 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed | 300 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 745 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the F-TYPE R P575 hits 100 km/h in 3.74 s versus 4.22 s for the P7. Despite lacking instant torque, 575 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-TYPE R P575 leads by 0.48 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 is doing 165 km/h against 147 km/h for the P7. The gap is 0.47 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE R P575 crosses the line in 11.52 s versus 12.54 s. The 1.02 s gap represents roughly 48 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 230 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE R P575 finishes in 20.70 s versus 25.24 s, with a 4.54 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-TYPE R P575 is capped at 300 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.49 seconds. The 0.48 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE R P575 wins (3,74 s vs 4,21 s).
F-TYPE R P575 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,74 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-TYPE R P575: 575 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp. P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
F-TYPE R P575: 300 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.