Sur 0–100 km/h, AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 gagne (3,36 s vs 3,92 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 | i4 M50 xDrive G26 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,36 s−0,56 s | 3,92 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,02 s−0,99 s | 12,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,73 s−2,24 s | 21,97 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 270 km/h+45 km/h | 225 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,22 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,07 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 | i4 M50 xDrive G26 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,13 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,54 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,54 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,36 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,23 s | 5,04 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,62 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,74 s | 13,16 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,02 s | 12,01 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,73 s | 21,97 s |
| Top speed | 270 km/h | 225 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 680 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1020 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 190 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 544 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 795 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 215 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-speed with fixed ratio |
Off the line, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell hits 100 km/h in 3.36 s versus 3.92 s for the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive. At this point, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell leads by 0.56 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell is doing 169 km/h against 155 km/h for the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive. The gap is 0.60 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell crosses the line in 11.02 s versus 12.01 s. The 0.99 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 241 km/h versus 216 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell finishes in 19.73 s versus 21.97 s, with a 2.24 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell is capped at 270 km/h, the Bmw i4 M50 xDrive at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.22 kg/hp vs 4.07 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.72 seconds. The 0.56 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 gagne (3,36 s vs 3,92 s).
AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 : 680 hp, ratio 3,22 kg/hp. i4 M50 xDrive G26 : 544 hp, ratio 4,07 kg/hp.
AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE T-Modell W206 : 270 km/h. i4 M50 xDrive G26 : 225 km/h.