Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance gagne (2,53 s vs 3,27 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| AMG S 63 E Performance W223 | Model S Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,27 s | 2,53 s+0,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s | 10,32 s+0,81 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,09 s | 19,02 s+1,07 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 262 km/h−12 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,24 kg/hp | 2,89 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | AMG S 63 E Performance W223 | Model S Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 0,71 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,49 s | 1,18 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,53 s | 1,91 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,27 s | 2,53 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,38 s | 3,31 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,95 s | 5,58 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,14 s | 8,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,13 s | 10,32 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,09 s | 19,02 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 262 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 802 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 1430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 250 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model S Performance hits 100 km/h in 2.53 s versus 3.27 s for the AMG S 63 E Performance. At this point, the Model S Performance leads by 0.74 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model S Performance is doing 175 km/h against 165 km/h for the AMG S 63 E Performance. The gap is 0.66 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Performance crosses the line in 10.31 s versus 11.12 s. The 0.81 s gap represents roughly 46 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 244 km/h versus 241 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Performance finishes in 19.02 s versus 20.09 s, with a 1.07 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 262 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the AMG S 63 E Performance is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Model S Performance at 262 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.24 kg/hp vs 2.89 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.89 seconds. The 0.74 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance gagne (2,53 s vs 3,27 s).
AMG S 63 E Performance W223 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,27 secondes (simulation calibrée).
AMG S 63 E Performance W223 : 802 hp, ratio 3,24 kg/hp. Model S Performance : 778 hp, ratio 2,89 kg/hp.
AMG S 63 E Performance W223 : 250 km/h. Model S Performance : 262 km/h.