Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range AWD wins (4,44 s vs 5,30 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | Model 3 Long Range AWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,44 s+0,87 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 12,80 s+0,77 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 23,49 s+1,09 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+17 km/h | 233 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,89 kg/hp | 5,34 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | E 400 e 4MATIC W214 | Model 3 Long Range AWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,18 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,06 s | 1,97 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,74 s | 3,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,30 s | 4,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,13 s | 5,93 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,19 s | 10,48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,66 s | 17,45 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,57 s | 12,80 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,58 s | 23,49 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 233 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 381 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 245 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 346 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 605 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 847 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Long Range AWD hits 100 km/h in 4.44 s versus 5.31 s for the E 400 e 4MATIC. At this point, the Model 3 Long Range AWD leads by 0.87 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD is doing 143 km/h against 135 km/h for the E 400 e 4MATIC. The gap is 0.55 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Long Range AWD crosses the line in 12.80 s versus 13.57 s. The 0.77 s gap represents roughly 35 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 190 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Long Range AWD finishes in 23.49 s versus 24.58 s, with a 1.09 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), the E 400 e 4MATIC never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the E 400 e 4MATIC is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Model 3 Long Range AWD at 233 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.89 kg/hp vs 5.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.31 seconds. The 0.87 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Long Range AWD wins (4,44 s vs 5,30 s).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,30 seconds (calibrated simulation).
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 381 hp, ratio 5,89 kg/hp. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 346 hp, ratio 5,34 kg/hp.
E 400 e 4MATIC W214: 250 km/h. Model 3 Long Range AWD: 233 km/h.