Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
A4BEVvsB520dDiesel
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs4 · 520d

MG4 Long Range RWD vs BMW 520d xDrive G30: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact · 2023 vs 2018 · Methodology
MGBEVFaster

4 Long Range RWD

245 hp · 350 Nm · 1,715 kg · 2023

VS
BMWDiesel

520d xDrive G30

190 hp · 400 Nm · 1,650 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AMG4 Long Range RWD

6.73 s

Gap0.65 sin favour of 4 Long Range RWD
BBMW 520d xDrive G30

7.38 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
Measure4 Long Range RWD520d xDrive G30Gap
0–100 km/h6.73 s7.38 s0.65 s · 4 Long Range RWD
400 m standing start14.92 s15.45 s0.53 s · 4 Long Range RWD
1,000 m standing start27.24 s28.10 s0.86 s · 4 Long Range RWD
Top speed (electronically limited)180 km/h232 km/h52 km/h · 520d xDrive G30
Power-to-weight ratio7.00 kg/hp8.68 kg/hpbetter ratio · 4 Long Range RWD

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

MGBEV4 Long Range RWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWDiesel520d xDrive G30
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
Stage4 Long Range RWD520d xDrive G30
0–30 km/h1.92 s1.79 s · tight gap
0–50 km/h3.21 s2.91 s
0–80 km/h5.16 s · tight gap5.20 s
0–100 km/h6.73 s7.38 s
0–120 km/h8.78 s10.21 s
0–160 km/h15.38 s18.29 s
0–200 km/h-33.66 s
400 m standing start14.92 s15.45 s
1,000 m standing start27.24 s28.10 s
Top speed180 km/h232 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

MG

4 Long Range RWD

7,00kg/hpratio better by 1,68 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power245 hpPending
Torque350 Nm
Weight1 715 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
BMW

520d xDrive G30

8,68kg/hpcompensated by −65 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power190 hp4 cyl
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 650 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 7.38 s for the 520d xDrive. The instant torque of 350 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the 520d xDrive is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 119 km/h for the 520d xDrive. The gap is 0.17 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.45 s. The 0.53 s gap represents roughly 22 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 28.10 s, with a 0.87 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (232 km/h), the 520d xDrive never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

The 520d xDrive features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the 4 Long Range RWD’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 4 Long Range RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the 520d xDrive at 232 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.86 seconds. The 0.65 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant vs 520d xDrive

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant TDI S tronic 150 kW vs 520d xDrive

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan vs 520d xDrive

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan vs 520d xDrive

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,38 s).

4 Long Range RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).

4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp. 520d xDrive G30: 190 hp, ratio 8,68 kg/hp.

4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h. 520d xDrive G30: 232 km/h.