Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,75 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | 4 Long Range RWD | 520e G30 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 7.75 s | 1.02 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.64 s | 0.72 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 29.03 s | 1.79 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 220 km/h | 40 km/h · 520e G30 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.00 kg/hp | 9.00 kg/hp | better ratio · 4 Long Range RWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | 4 Long Range RWD | 520e G30 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.92 s | 1.38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.21 s | 2.48 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5.16 s · tight gap | 5.17 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.73 s | 7.75 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8.78 s | 11.11 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15.38 s | 21.48 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 45.10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.92 s | 15.64 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27.24 s | 29.03 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 220 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 835 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 7.75 s for the 520e. Despite the faster sprint time, the 520e is 8 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 114 km/h for the 520e. The gap is 0.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 15.64 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 157 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 29.03 s, with a 1.80 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (220 km/h), the 520e never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 4 Long Range RWD is capped at 180 km/h, the 520e at 225 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.00 kg/hp vs 9.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.17 seconds. The 1.02 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 7,75 s).
4 Long Range RWD goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).
4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp. 520e G30: 204 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp.
4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h. 520e G30: 220 km/h.