Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,38 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 911 Targa 4 991.2 | A110 GT 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,38 s | 3,92 s+0,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,45 s | 11,97 s+0,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,44 s | 21,76 s+0,68 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 283 km/h+11 km/h | 272 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,19 kg/hp | 3,65 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 911 Targa 4 991.2 | A110 GT 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,23 s | 1,13 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,05 s | 1,89 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,37 s | 3,06 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,38 s | 3,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,69 s | 5,15 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,07 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,16 s | 12,68 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,45 s | 11,97 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,44 s | 21,76 s |
| Top speed | 283 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 375 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 449 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 570 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 340 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 114 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed dual-clutch |
Off the line, the A110 GT 300 hits 100 km/h in 3.92 s versus 4.38 s for the 911 Targa 4. At this point, the A110 GT 300 leads by 0.46 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the A110 GT 300 is doing 157 km/h against 152 km/h for the 911 Targa 4. The gap is 0.34 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the A110 GT 300 crosses the line in 11.96 s versus 12.44 s. The 0.48 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the A110 GT 300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 211 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the A110 GT 300 finishes in 21.76 s versus 22.44 s, with a 0.68 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (283 vs 272 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 288 km/h, the 911 Targa 4 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.19 kg/hp vs 3.65 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.44 seconds. The 0.46 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, A110 GT 300 wins (3,92 s vs 4,38 s).
911 Targa 4 991.2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,38 seconds (calibrated simulation).
911 Targa 4 991.2: 375 hp, ratio 4,19 kg/hp. A110 GT 300: 305 hp, ratio 3,65 kg/hp.
911 Targa 4 991.2: 283 km/h. A110 GT 300: 272 km/h.