Sur 0–100 km/h, 911 Turbo S 992 gagne (2,53 s vs 3,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 911 Turbo S 992 | RS6 Performance Avant | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s−0,93 s | 3,46 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,01 s−1,30 s | 11,31 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,17 s−2,20 s | 20,37 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 322 km/h | 346 km/h−24 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,43 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,45 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 911 Turbo S 992 | RS6 Performance Avant |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,73 s | 0,99 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,22 s | 1,65 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 1,96 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s | 3,46 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,26 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,13 s | 7,06 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 7,66 s | 10,72 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,01 s | 11,31 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 18,17 s | 20,37 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h | 346 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 711 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 725 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 630 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 175 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the 911 Turbo S hits 100 km/h in 2.53 s versus 3.46 s for the RS6 Performance Avant. At this point, the 911 Turbo S leads by 0.93 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 911 Turbo S is doing 185 km/h against 165 km/h for the RS6 Performance Avant. The gap is 0.90 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the 911 Turbo S crosses the line in 10.00 s versus 11.30 s. The 1.30 s gap represents roughly 72 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 911 Turbo S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 257 km/h versus 231 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 911 Turbo S finishes in 18.17 s versus 20.37 s, with a 2.20 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (346 km/h), the RS6 Performance Avant never recovers its launch deficit.
Electronically capped at 322 (i.e. 200 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the 911 Turbo S never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.43 kg/hp vs 3.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.02 seconds. The 0.93 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 911 Turbo S 992 gagne (2,53 s vs 3,46 s).
911 Turbo S 992 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 2,53 secondes (simulation calibrée).
911 Turbo S 992 : 711 hp, ratio 2,43 kg/hp. RS6 Performance Avant : 630 hp, ratio 3,45 kg/hp.
911 Turbo S 992 : 322 km/h. RS6 Performance Avant : 346 km/h.