Sur 0–100 km/h, Boxster S 981 gagne (5,08 s vs 5,28 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Boxster S 981 | GR Supra 2.0 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,08 s−0,21 s | 5,28 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,23 s−0,30 s | 13,53 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,87 s−0,65 s | 24,52 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h | 272 km/h−10 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,32 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,79 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Boxster S 981 | GR Supra 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,43 s | 1,34 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,38 s | 2,23 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,91 s | 3,82 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,08 s | 5,28 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,61 s | 6,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,72 s | 11,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,41 s | 19,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,23 s | 13,53 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,87 s | 24,52 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 272 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 314 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 361 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 355 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 6 speed standard |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 495 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Sport Automatic (ZF) |
Off the line, the Boxster S hits 100 km/h in 5.08 s versus 5.28 s for the GR Supra 2.0. Despite the faster sprint time, the GR Supra 2.0 is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Boxster S is doing 143 km/h against 137 km/h for the GR Supra 2.0. The gap is 0.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Boxster S crosses the line in 13.23 s versus 13.52 s. The 0.29 s gap represents roughly 14 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Boxster S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 198 km/h versus 191 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Boxster S finishes in 23.87 s versus 24.51 s, with a 0.65 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (262 vs 272 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 274 km/h, the Boxster S never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.32 kg/hp vs 5.79 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.11 seconds. The 0.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Boxster S 981 gagne (5,08 s vs 5,28 s).
Boxster S 981 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,08 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Boxster S 981 : 314 hp, ratio 4,32 kg/hp. GR Supra 2.0 : 258 hp, ratio 5,79 kg/hp.
Boxster S 981 : 262 km/h. GR Supra 2.0 : 272 km/h.