Among the 47 S 2010–2014, the Boxster S ranks 45th of 47 in 0–100 km/h (5.1 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 40th of 47 in Top speed (274 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 41th of 47 in Power-to-weight (232 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
981 · GENERATION 2012 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
Boxster S
314 hp, 5,1 s 0-100 : among the 47 S 2010–2014, the Boxster S ranks 45th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 40th of 47 in Top speed, 41th of 47 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
314hp
361 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.1s
VMax 274 km/h
Cons.
10.7L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Boxster S
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,436 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 314 hp |
| Combined power | 314 hp |
| Combined torque | 361 Nm |
| Gearbox | Double embrayage 6 rapports |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10.7 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,1 s |
| VMax | 274 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,371 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,416 mm |
| Width | 1,801 mm |
| Height | 1,293 mm |
| Boot | 10 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,355 kg |
| Cd | 0.29 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 47 S, the Boxster S ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 5.1 s 0-100 (45th of 47 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Boxster S ranks 45th of 47 in 0–100 km/h, 2.2 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 274 km/h (40th of 47 in Top speed)
Top speed of 274 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Boxster S stands against S
Comparison across 47 S marketed between 2010–2014.
0–100 km/h45e / 47
5,1 s
Min 5,1 s · Porsche Boxster SMax 2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Top speed40e / 47
274 km/h
Min 267 km/h · Porsche Boxster SpyderMax 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Power-to-weight41e / 47
232 hp/t
Min 226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)Max 444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 sDrive30i258 hp · 0-100 5.4 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Boxster 981 range
Generation 981 launched in 2012. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 981
Compare
Popular duels involving the Boxster S
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Boxster S: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 5.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Boxster S vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.