Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,76 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Cayenne E3.1 | Stelvio Veloce | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s | 5.76 s | 0.13 s · Cayenne E3.1 |
| 400 m standing start | 13.87 s | 14.12 s | 0.25 s · Cayenne E3.1 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.36 s | 26.01 s | 0.65 s · Cayenne E3.1 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 230 km/h | 15 km/h · Cayenne E3.1 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5.84 kg/hp | 6.59 kg/hp | better ratio · Cayenne E3.1 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Cayenne E3.1 | Stelvio Veloce |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.33 s | 1.32 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.24 s · tight gap | 2.24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.02 s · tight gap | 4.12 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5.63 s · tight gap | 5.76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.59 s | 7.99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.19 s | 14.32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23.12 s | 26.33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13.87 s | 14.12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.36 s | 26.01 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 230 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Cayenne hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.76 s for the Stelvio Veloce. The 0.13 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne is doing 133 km/h against 129 km/h for the Stelvio Veloce. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 14.12 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne finishes in 25.36 s versus 26.01 s, with a 0.65 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne is capped at 245 km/h, the Stelvio Veloce at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.84 kg/hp vs 6.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.26 seconds. The 0.13 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,76 s).
Cayenne E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp. Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp.
Cayenne E3.1: 245 km/h. Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h.