Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 gagne (5,63 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | Cayenne E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 5,63 s+0,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s | 13,87 s+0,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,56 s | 25,36 s+0,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 246 km/h+1 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,04 kg/hp | 5,84 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | Cayenne E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,25 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,02 s | 4,02 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,68 s | 7,59 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,53 s | 13,19 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,85 s | 23,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,94 s | 13,87 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,56 s | 25,36 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 055 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.63 s for the Cayenne. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne is doing 133 km/h against 131 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 13.94 s. The 0.07 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 181 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne finishes in 25.36 s versus 25.56 s, with a 0.20 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (246 vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.04 kg/hp vs 5.84 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.89 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 gagne (5,63 s vs 5,63 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,63 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 340 hp, ratio 6,04 kg/hp. Cayenne E3.1 : 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 246 km/h. Cayenne E3.1 : 245 km/h.