Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS 958.1 wins (5,56 s vs 5,76 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne GTS 958.1 | Stelvio Veloce | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,56 s−0,20 s | 5,76 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,70 s−0,42 s | 14,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,71 s−1,30 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+31 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,96 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,59 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne GTS 958.1 | Stelvio Veloce |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,48 s | 1,32 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,46 s | 2,24 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,03 s | 4,12 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,56 s | 5,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,24 s | 7,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,09 s | 14,32 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,82 s | 26,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,70 s | 14,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,71 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | Engine block and cylinder heads formed in aluminum |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 085 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Cayenne GTS hits 100 km/h in 5.56 s versus 5.76 s for the Stelvio Veloce. Despite the faster sprint time, the Stelvio Veloce is 2 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne GTS is doing 137 km/h against 129 km/h for the Stelvio Veloce. The gap is 0.10 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne GTS crosses the line in 13.70 s versus 14.12 s. The 0.42 s gap represents roughly 18 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 191 km/h versus 177 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne GTS finishes in 24.70 s versus 26.01 s, with a 1.30 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne GTS is capped at 261 km/h, the Stelvio Veloce at 230 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.96 kg/hp vs 6.59 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.26 seconds. The 0.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS 958.1 wins (5,56 s vs 5,76 s).
Cayenne GTS 958.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,56 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne GTS 958.1: 420 hp, ratio 4,96 kg/hp. Stelvio Veloce: 280 hp, ratio 6,59 kg/hp.
Cayenne GTS 958.1: 261 km/h. Stelvio Veloce: 230 km/h.