Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 wins (4,37 s vs 7,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne GTS E3.1 | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s−3,21 s | 7,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,66 s−2,96 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s−5,50 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 266 km/h+66 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,88 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne GTS E3.1 | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,93 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,57 s | 2,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,00 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,37 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,94 s | 10,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,45 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,24 s | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,66 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,38 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed | 266 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 600 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 247 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Cayenne GTS hits 100 km/h in 4.37 s versus 7.58 s for the Compass 4xe. Despite lacking instant torque, 460 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Cayenne GTS leads by 3.21 s and sits roughly 24 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne GTS is doing 142 km/h against 116 km/h for the Compass 4xe. The gap is 1.96 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne GTS crosses the line in 12.66 s versus 15.62 s. The 2.96 s gap represents roughly 113 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne GTS finishes in 23.37 s versus 28.87 s, with a 5.50 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne GTS is capped at 270 km/h, the Compass 4xe at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 3.21 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne GTS E3.1 wins (4,37 s vs 7,58 s).
Cayenne GTS E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne GTS E3.1: 460 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
Cayenne GTS E3.1: 266 km/h. Compass 4xe: 200 km/h.