Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR wins (4,35 s vs 7,58 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| F-PACE SVR | Compass 4xe | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s−3,23 s | 7,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−3,32 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s−6,82 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h+85 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,68 kg/hpbetter ratio | 9,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | F-PACE SVR | Compass 4xe |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,26 s | 1,62 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,10 s | 2,72 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,44 s | 5,25 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,35 s | 7,58 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 10,77 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,68 s | 20,78 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,35 s | 50,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,06 s | 28,88 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 680 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 024 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 817 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed automatic |
Off the line, the F-PACE SVR hits 100 km/h in 4.35 s versus 7.58 s for the Compass 4xe. Despite lacking instant torque, 550 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-PACE SVR leads by 3.23 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-PACE SVR is doing 154 km/h against 116 km/h for the Compass 4xe. The gap is 1.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-PACE SVR crosses the line in 12.30 s versus 15.62 s. The 3.32 s gap represents roughly 125 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the F-PACE SVR continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE SVR finishes in 22.05 s versus 28.87 s, with a 6.82 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the F-PACE SVR is capped at 285 km/h, the Compass 4xe at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.66 seconds. The 3.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-PACE SVR wins (4,35 s vs 7,58 s).
F-PACE SVR goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
F-PACE SVR: 550 hp, ratio 3,68 kg/hp. Compass 4xe: 190 hp, ratio 9,56 kg/hp.
F-PACE SVR: 285 km/h. Compass 4xe: 200 km/h.